2010s, 3.5/4, Action, Christopher Nolan, Review

The Dark Knight Rises

Amazon.com: Batman: The Dark Knight Rises - Movie Poster (Regular Style / A  Fire Will Rise) (Size: 24" x 36"): Posters & Prints

#6 in my ranking of Christopher Nolan’s films.

#4 in my ranking of theatrically released Batman films.

For a while, I maintained that this was the best of the Dark Knight trilogy. Watching it for the first time in a few years, I can certainly see why. The second half is pure spectacle filmmaking at an epic scale with an extended set piece that feels expansive and alive and huge all at once. However, that first hour or so is much messier, and I think that last half of the film, largely got me to ignore some of the niggling issues that frontend the film.

The Batman has been absent from Gotham City for eight years. In that time, Gotham has seen a period of peace and prosperity it has not experienced in a very long time. In order to create that sense of calm, though, Police Commissioner Gordon pumped up the idol of Harvey Dent who had become the psychopathic villain Two-Face, murdered several people, and threatened to kill Gordon’s son as the White Knight, blaming all of his crimes on Batman. Together with the Mayor and the City Council, they passed the Dent Act which allowed for aggressive anti-crime actions on the part of the police, resulting in a city without any serious organized crime at all. In this time, Bruce Wayne, Batman’s alter ego, has become a recluse, having spent several post-Batman years and half of his fortune pursuing a fusion reactor before suddenly shutting it down and closing himself off from the world.

In enters Bane, a member of the League of Shadows and a former acolyte of Ra’s Al Ghul, since excommunicated for his extreme methods. After the death of Ra’s Al Ghul, Bane took over the League of Shadows and will continue the man’s mission of burning Gotham to the ground, much like the League had done to Rome and London before it. The revolution he ignites is based heavily on the Jacobins of France during the French Revolution, which fits hand in hand with the overall movie’s ties to Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities. He speaks of equality, but he rules with an iron fist, establishing a Committee for Public Safety, so to speak, that summarily executes enemies of the revolution. In order to get there, though, Bane must take control of Gotham.

Now, the first half of the film is really setup for the giant spectacle that dominates the second half, and some of it is quite good and other elements end up going a bit too far. From beginning to end, I think Bane is great. He’s intimidating physically and he ends up with a great plan to acquire wealth and demean Batman at the same time. Stealing his fingerprints through Catwoman/Selina Kyle to fake reckless options trading that wipes out his position in Wayne Enterprises is wonderful. The chase out of the Stock Exchange, giving Bruce Wayne his first moment as Batman in eight years, is exciting and well filmed. That it leaves Wayne so destitute that he can’t pay his own power bill is…curious and a step too far. I get the point. The point is to take Wayne as low as possible both as Batman and as Wayne himself, but having his power shut off because of nonpayment roughly a day after his loses all his money feels weird at best and completely ignorant of how things work in the real world at worst.

Another very good thing that the first hour does is establish the overall thematic thrust of the film, and that’s around pain. Bruce is suffering from a leg injury. That’s good. He immediately gets cured well enough to fight as Batman again because of a gadget on his leg. That’s…less good. And yet, the idea runs through the rest of it very well. Wayne carries the pain of his loss of Rachel Dawes, from The Dark Knight (to the point that people misinterpret his receding from the world due to that loss, but that’s not the case). Gordon carries the pain of having to defend the man who tried to kill his son, while losing that son in a divorce at the same time. The city carries the scars of past trauma brought on by the Joker, but it manages to live on, just as Gordon does. And what do these people do with their pain? Well, more pain must come first.

Bane’s efforts to take the city end up feeling great. He has an inside man at Wayne Enterprises, also knows that Wayne is Batman because of his connection to the League of Shadows, and he uses the greed of Daggett, a wealthy executive who wants to absorb Wayne Enterprises, to prepare his plan of cutting off the city from the rest of the world. But first, he must take out the Batman. That the “every police officer” gets trapped in the sewars is…less good, though. It’s another step too far that didn’t quite need to be taken. However, this element of the plot is where Selena Kyle is useful.

Anne Hathaway as Selena Kyle is really good. She can switch between woundedly scared and feminine to coyly vicious and feminine in an instant. She steals into Wayne Manor as a servant at a party and shows both sides to Bruce as she steals his mother’s pearls and his fingerprints, setting up the plot of the film. She’s a survivor with a chip on her shoulder, so she’s happy to watch as Bruce loses everything as the result of her actions. However she does still have a certain sense of justice so when Bane completely takes over and Gotham descends into a hellscape reminiscent of the French Terror, she’s bothered by it, but being a survivor she does little to stop or escape it.

The movie turns when Batman has his confrontation with Bane. Evoking the famous comics scenario of Bane breaking Batman’s back in the Knightfall run (pretty much the only time I was reading comics, by the way), Bane breaks Batman and sends him to a prison with hope, the worst punishment he can imagine. The visual image of Bruce needing to rise from the pit in order to overcome his pain and fear is great. That it takes him so much effort and that he has to essentially return to an earlier form of himself in order to do it is even better. There’s such rich imagery here.

The final confrontation between Batman, as a symbol of order, and Bane, as a symbol of chaos and fire, dominates the last half of the movie. The film leaves open some unimportant questions of how Bruce Wayne gets from India to Gotham in about three weeks, but considering the character’s history of running in the underworld, including in the Far East, that seems easily filled in by the audience, and once he’s there he leads an all out rebellion against the ruling Revolutionary government with an aim towards getting his hands on the nuclear bomb set to go off in twelve hours. Yeah, it’s very comic booky, but it’s handled with the right balance of seriousness that I think the movie sells the situation well.

And in terms of the final act, the spectacle of Batman leading an army in a war against Bane for control of Gotham and against a Jacobin Revolution is great. Batman the symbol leads those who had cowered away in fear to take to the streets, fulfilling the promise of Batman as a symbol established in the first movie (and re-explained to Blake, the cop who has figured out that Wayne is Batman in…another individual step that feels too far in the first half). The evocation of A Tale of Two Cities also helps provide the film a literary understructure that I appreciate. It’s not just random bad guys butting up against a protagonist we all know from pop culture. It’s a literary extension of the mythos.

I feel like this was a bit of a ramble, but I’m gonna stick with it. The Dark Knight Rises is not a perfect movie. Its first half ends up taking a few ideas too far, which undermines them slightly, but not the overall story. What ends up carrying it all, though, is Nolan’s sheer command of everything outside the script. Performances are very good. The spectacle is great. The use of image and sound creates a large story that carries interesting ideas about pain and the efforts to deal with it. It’s an intelligent and rousing film that could have been a bit tighter, but, by the end, I don’t really care that much.

Rating: 3.5/4

5 thoughts on “The Dark Knight Rises”

  1. I think Nolan’s ‘The Dark Knight’ is the best of his Batman movies, not this one.

    This is half of a great movie with a lot of stuff that would work in the Tim Burton ‘comic book’ Batman movies but don’t work in this more grounded take. You can’t have it both ways, you can’t be grounded and gritty and then have hand-waving magic technology, teleportation powers and stupid, yet apparently immortal cops. (Seriously, what were they eating and drinking in a sewer for months and months?)

    The good part…is really good. Ann Hathaway is yummy. Tom Hardy’s Bane is every bit as good as the Chuck Dixon comic book version, the movie lights up when he’s on camera. The takeover of Gotham…is stupid but entertaining. Or…maybe it’s not stupid, considering Portland and ANTIFA’s unchecked dominance there.

    But the negatives drag it down. I’d rate it a 2/4. I don’t like Christian Bale’s Batman take, especially his voice. I didn’t like Talia, terrible casting and the ‘big reveal’ that she was the escapee beggared belief (this isn’t a world where waif women kick everyone’s ass, unlike other films). Other plot holes you touched on, so I won’t go into too much except to second them.

    I saw it and I’m glad I saw it, but it can only be a guilty pleasure, it’s not greatness.


    1. Yeah, there are some definite jumps in logic, but I think the spectacle of the ending as well as the movie’s thematic strengths outweigh its handful of mechanical deficiencies.

      The teleportation complaint usually gets aimed at Wayne making it from India to Gotham, and the complaint irritates me. There’s a large section in the first movie about how he moves around the world without money for literally years. It takes Wayne weeks to get back to Gotham when the seasons change and the clock on the bomb goes from about 40 days to about 15. I also don’t think it’s a huge stretch to imagine one man getting across the Gotham river unnoticed from the outside in since the concern is more about not letting people out. In short, I don’t think Wayne’s reappearance is a stretch or requires an explicit explanation since the building blocks are all there.

      The movie as a whole doesn’t hold together as well as The Dark Knight, for sure, but I still kind of love it.


  2. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anybody who was as wrong about anything as you are wrong about this movie—a movie which is bad beyond all comprehension. Now I could explain all the things that are wrong with the movie—making my airtight case with one perfectly argued point after another. But that’s really not necessary—because the comprehensive failure of The Dark Knight Rises can be definitively proven by referencing just one scene from the film. One single scene is all it takes. And the scene of which I speak is (of course) the scene in which a school bus full of children is trapped on a bridge. And the bridge is about to explode. And by the way, these aren’t merely any children—these children are orphans. (I think some of them were handicapped too, or sick…?) Yes, ORPHANS! And they’re TRAPPED! And the bridge is about to BLOW UP!

    I guess the stakes weren’t high enough already, so they had to include a scene where they pretended there was a possibility that a bus load of orphans might get blown up. To put it mildly, this is retarded. And unfortunately, in no way is this incredibly terrible scene the exception when compared to the film as a whole. The entire movie is filled with this kind of lazy, hacky and ridiculous writing. It’s genuinely baffling that this ridiculous movie was the work of the same person responsible for The Dark Knight, which was genuinely fantastic.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s