2010s, 3.5/4, Action, Bryan Singer, Review

X-Men: Days of Future Past

Amazon.com: WMG X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014) 24" x 36" Borderless  Poster (Thick) Glossy Finish: Posters & Prints

#1 in my ranking of the X-Men franchise.

This is probably the best the X-Men franchise is going to get, especially considering the ensemble approach most of the films take. I think there’s some unfocused storytelling going on that keeps it a hair’s breadth away from greatness, but overall this is the best balancing act the franchise ever pulled off, managing two different casts and timelines with shocking style and seeming ease. Bryan Singer really brought his A-game, making possibly his best movie here.

This franchise fits best together when you don’t think about it too hard, keeping up generalities about relationships in mind without demanding specifics. In a surprisingly bold move, the movie starts by skipping ahead into the future to give us the X-Men version of a Terminator future where mutants are chased down by Sentinels that can detect them, adapt to their powers, and easily dispatch them if caught. The opening is nearly on par with the Nightcrawler attack on the White House that opened X2 in terms of cinematically introducing the audience to the world and the threat. This is a shockingly good action scene with almost no dialogue to explain who’s what, the stakes, or the overall purpose, but it’s still amazingly good edge of your seat entertainment with a handful of very specific goals: the danger of the Sentinels, the overall world, the minor characters, and the basic power that they will use to send Wolverine back in time.

In 1973 Mystique killed a man named Bolivar Trask who was developing a mutant hunting weapon called the Sentinel. The assassination convinced the world that anti-mutant weapons were the best course of action instead of stopping development, and decades later they perfected and implemented the weapons, creating the dystopian vision the movie starts in. Professor Xavier, Magneto, Storm, and Wolverine find our minor characters led by Iceman and Kitty Pride in order to use Kitty’s power of sending a person’s consciousness into their younger self, how they were able to undo the attack that started the film. The plan would be to send Xavier back to 1973, but the length of time would be particularly difficult on the physical body, something his elderly frame couldn’t take, so they send back Wolverine, ageless and able to heal instantly. Now, all of this is explained very quickly through clunky exposition, its only saving grace being that it’s done so quickly. We don’t have a couple of ten minute long scenes to explain it, it all comes out in a couple of minutes and then we’re off. So, I can wish all day long that it was explained more elegantly, but at least it’s done quickly.

Sent back in time, Logan searches out Xavier who is taking a serum to suppress his powers and give him the ability to walk at the same time. Guarded and accompanied by Beast, who takes the same serum to suppress his new blue visage, Xavier has become jaded from his mission after the saving of the world from nuclear war at the end of First Class only led to a temporary understanding with humans and the Vietnam War robbed him of many of his teachers and students. Disillusioned, he refuses to listen to Wolverine at first, but mentioning Xavier’s childhood friend, Raven/Mystique, is enough to get him out of the house. In order to convince her, though, they decide that they need to free Magneto from his prison several hundred feet below the Pentagon. In order to do that, Wolverine points them in the direction of Peter Maximoff, a young man in 1973 that Wolverine knew as an older man in the future but is a kleptomaniac youth who can run faster than the eye can see.

The breakout is a fantastic sequence, told with energy and humor. It’s the absolute standout moment of the movie as Xavier and Beast mess with the video surveillance, Maximoff takes a guard uniform, speeds Magneto from his cell, and then takes out a room full of guards as they fire guns at the group in a kitchen with the sprinkler system on. The use of “Time in a Bottle” fits perfectly with the scene, also providing an auditory counterpoint to the action that helps sell the comedic aspects of what’s going on.

This movie does a better job of including the overall political climate than First Class did. Trask is brought into a Senate hearing early. Xavier is jaded by Vietnam. Trask goes to Paris to participate in the Paris Peace Accords where Mystique plans on assassinating him, needing to use her ability to mimic people by copying a Vietnamese general. The mutant team arrives just in time, and Magneto just has the most amazing moments. He bend a bullet’s path to shoot Raven in the leg. He uses the bullet in her leg to drag her towards him. He’s going to kill her to protect their future. I’m a broken record on this, but Michael Fassbender is the best casting choice made in the X-Men movies.

Everything comes to a head in DC where, at the same time in the future, the Sentinels have found the mutant hideout and both confrontations happen at the same “time”. Now, that’s just solid story construction right there, but it falls apart slightly on a second viewing. First of all, Magneto pulling Robert F. Kennedy Stadium up off the ground, flying it over to the White House, and plopping it around the Executive Mansion to cut off any police or military support from the ground while he uses the first generation Sentinels to provide air support is just great stuff. Xavier using his powers to plea with Raven as she gets within striking distance of Trask, who’s on stage with President Nixon, is very good. Wolverine, though, he doesn’t have a whole lot to do, and when Magneto throws him away from the scene into the Potomac River he’s done with the scene. Where this ends up mattering is how it interacts with the future segment as the mutants steadily lose ground and people to the incoming threat. It’s unclear at what point Wolverine has set the future on the right course, but it’s long before Kitty Pride breaks the connection with him. His lack of involvement in the third act where he is a lynchpin of dramatic tension undermines that really well done third act a bit.

Every character is going through different emotional arcs that aren’t really related. Xavier is learning to re-embrace his powers after being jaded. Raven is learning that violence won’t solve everything. Wolverine is learning, well, not much. The movie’s focus isn’t on these journeys and they’re done well enough on their own, all tied together through the machinations of the plot so we never feel like they’re unrelated scenes just plopped in out of nowhere, but I can wish that they were more in line with each other thematically. However, in a big spectacle driven action movie, that’s not a huge problem at all when the focus is mainly elsewhere.

Overall, this is a rousing fun time at the movies. An intelligently constructed adventure through time that uses special effects and action filmmaking tools to propel the audience the whole way through the two hour experience. This is comic book filmmaking on a grand scale, and while it may not be perfect, it’s really enjoyable.

Rating: 3.5/4

8 thoughts on “X-Men: Days of Future Past”

  1. Meh. A rousing Meh, that’s this movie for me.

    I also loved the opening segment with the Sentinel fight. You get to see mutants using their powers, which is sadly what’s missing from most superhero movies (because SFX is expensive).
    But the overplot does not make sense to me. From a writing viewpoint, Wolverine is the exactly wrong person to send back in time to try to persuade people. He’s never, ever, every been a talker or a persuader. He’s a killer, a savage. They don’t even do anything with that conflict or flaw, but simply assume that he is able. He has shockingly little to do, as you mentioned in the third act. They should have just dropped him. This would actually have been the perfect time to introduce Bishop, who actually has this role in the comics, as a time traveler from an alternate dystopian future.

    I still love Fassbender but I didn’t buy his treatment of Mystique. Jennifer Lawrence is at her career-worst, perhaps, in terms of performance. I didn’t like Xavier at all. And frankly, by the end of this movie, I’d come around 180 degrees and was thinking the Sentinels was the right move for humanity.



    1. I’m sure the real reason to focus on Wolverine is because the studio and everyone else thinks that Wolverine and Hugh Jackman are the star of the franchise, and every movie needs to revolve around him. Of course, there’s the literal explanation in the movie that he’s the only one physically capable of making the journey which is the justification for the real reason. The first time through, Wolverine seems really important, but upon subsequent viewings he stops being important before the halfway point of the movie. Which is really weird.


      1. Jah, I know Jackman is the franchise star.
        But if you HAD to have him, it should be only as a future self cameo in the opening scene, and then have him be a scene stealer as his old self. I’m sure as a actor Hugh would have gone for it.


  2. Definitely the best xmen movie (if you exclude Logan on a technicality) and a solid piece of drama.

    Let’s also be honest, the xmen comics were hardly the tightest plotted. It is a question of whether the xmen are even very adaptable to movies. Longer formats like comics and TV are just better suited for large casts.


    1. That’s a good point.

      Everything needed to be turned into movies for the longest time because they had the highest potential in terms of cultural reach and financial returns, so everything got bucketed into the movies whenever possible to try and take advantage of that whether the material was suited for the medium or not.

      It’s like how I think short stories are a better source for movies than novels.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Oh definitely, unless you can set up a guarantee multi picture deal like LotR’s 3 films. (Let’s not talk about the Hobbit…)

        I don’t think TV & Streaming is quite up to doing the xmen justice unless animated (remember the 90s series? i do), but it’s getting there. Could very well see it within our lifetimes.


      2. It’ll be interesting to see how Disney chooses to approach the X-Men going forward. They seem happy with the success of the MCU shows on Disney+, allowing them longer form storytelling from more minor characters.

        Would they do the same to introduce Wolverine into the MCU?

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s