1/4, 1990s, Fantasy, Joel Schumacher, Review

Batman Forever

Batman Forever (1995) - IMDb

#14 in my ranking of theatrically released Batman films.

And so the franchise machines goes on. The studio didn’t want Tim Burton back to continue infecting their movies about an orphaned child who grew up to beat up criminals in costume with gothic darkness, so they brought in Joel Schumacher to lighten up the affair. The leaving of Burton caused the departure of Michael Keaton as well, and Val Kilmer was cast in his place. So, what did Warner Brothers manage to get produced here? Essentially a confused toy commercial because the merchandizing scene from Spaceballs was pretty much how studio executives learned to think through the 80s and 90s.

I’ll say this upfront: I do not dislike this film because its visual palate is more colorful and its tone less serious. I dislike this movie because its script is a complete hodgepodge of nonsense while the end result film is edited together to make things that shouldn’t go together stand right next to each other. I would be very open to a Batman film that took the world and story less seriously with an emphasis on crazier villains for our hero to fight. I don’t need my Batman movies to be somber and serious explorations of duality, loneliness, and vigilantism. I could do well with a film that is just another in a series of Batman adventures where he has to put weird villains in Arkham Asylum. That is not actually what Joel Schumacher achieved in Batman Forever.

The film starts with an audacious action scene where Harvey Dent/Two-Face (Tommy Lee Jones) sets a trap for Batman in a bank high up on a tower at the center of Gotham. Using lots of neon colors in garish ways, we get our new view of the city in which the Dark Knight stalks. It’s an expansion on the gothic designs Burton had put forward in the first two films with huge statues of Greek god-like figures holding up buildings. It’s garish, but I can dig it.

The scene sets for a couple of things. The first is that Two Face wants to kill Batman as his motivation for the film. The second is the presence of Dr. Chase Meridian (Nicole Kidman), a psychologist brought in by the police department to analyze Two Face (she never really does beyond a quick diagnosis in this scene) who develops a quick infatuation with Batman when they briefly meet. The action itself is big, bold, largely nonsensical, and entertaining. I’m okay with this. It’s a thin way to start a film, perhaps trying to replicate a certain James Bond-esque action opening in a continuing adventure, but it’s fun enough.

The film makes it obvious that it’s a complete mishmash when it introduces Jim Carrey’s Edward Nigma. Carrey approaches the part from the start like a maniac, giving him no place to go in terms of his performance. Nigma has developed a new technology that enhances television signals for the viewer. As an employee of Wayne Enterprises, he wants Bruce Wayne, visiting on an inspection, to promise further funding of the project over the objections of his immediate supervisor. Wayne refuses because of the unanswered questions (get it?) about the device’s effect on brainwaves. Nigma takes it badly, forces his boss into a human trial that ends with a side effect of Nigma absorbing his brainwaves, making him smarter (how this manifests is never really clear). He kills his boss, fakes the evidence to make it look like a suicide, and then leaves the company.

Two Face attacks a charity circus where Bruce Wayne has taken Chase on a date, and at this circus are the Graysons, a family of acrobats who work together to move the bomb that Two Face brings (and attaches to a wire that ascends to the ceiling where the Graysons can do it while never bothering to try and leave the building that’s about to blow up himself), and the youngest, Dick, is the only to survive when the rest fall to their deaths. Nigma watches this on television and becomes enthralled with the idea of becoming his own supervillain.

Nigma figures out where Two Face’s hidden base is, somehow, through the use of the Box, his television device. He appears and says that these things on a side table showed him where the place was, but it doesn’t seem like anyone’s used them yet. Anyway, they decide to team up with the Riddler using his technology to try and figure out who Batman is and then humiliate him before Two Face gets the chance to kill him. The Riddler’s motivation is thin, essentially amounting to hating Wayne because Wayne wouldn’t fund his research. It works well enough.

At the same time, there’s the only element that feels like it’s supposed to be a direct follow up to what came before in Batman Returns, the relationship between Wayne and Chase. Wayne is confronting the ideas from the last movie about having two sides of his life, and he ends up deciding by the end that he can live with both because he chooses to. This supposedly happens through his relationship with Chase, but the stuff is so lost in the noise surrounding it that almost none of it registers. This is a sign of a script driven by executive notes over artistic intent.

The plot resolves with the Riddler figuring out that Bruce Wayne is Batman, kidnapping Chase, and having a big showdown on his island fortress. It really does feel like a modified concept from a Moore era Bond picture. Dick Grayson (Chris O’Donnell who looks like he’s thirty) gets taken in by Bruce, figures out his secret identity, and then gets a highly custom Robin suit seemingly out of nowhere to help Batman fight. The showdown is as garish and over the top as anything else in the film with knowing nods to the 60s Batman show. It’s big and loud and thinly entertaining as spectacle, but what’s come before has been so overstuffed with characters, events that never mattered, and plot movements that it’s hard to see how there’s supposed to be any relief beyond the purely sensory when it all winds down.

Speaking of random events that don’t matter, there’s an action scene relatively early that could literally be hard cut out of the film, saving 6 minutes or so, and the film would suffer none at all. Batman is driving around, Two Face and his men approach in cars with guns blazing, Batman gets away. That’s it. That’s the scene. It includes a bit where Batman uses the Batmobile to climb up the side of a building (in another supposed nod to the television show), but how he ends up getting down is never explained. It’s just there, and it doesn’t change anything from beginning to end. I’m sure it stayed in because it was expensive, but it really could have just been hard cut and no one would have noticed. In another sequence, the attack on Wayne Mansion that leads to the kidnapping of Chase, the scene is cut and scored in a way to demonstrate danger, but Schumacher let Carrey be Carrey. So, when the Riddler is blowing up the Batcave, everything stops so that Carrey can do a bit pretending that one of his little bat bombs is a baseball and he’s a pitcher, complete with sound effects.

Another thing is that this leaves so much on the table in terms of ideas. At one point, pretty much out of nowhere, Bruce decides that he’s done being Batman, telling Dick that he can’t do it anymore (it supposedly has something to do with his relationship with Chase), and then the Riddler destroys the Batcave. Is there any contemplation about how Batman is necessary? No, it just continues with hidden toys (I mean, prototypes) as though this were just another adventure story. You don’t include the idea of Batman hanging up his cape and cowl if it’s just another adventure story.

Like the first two films, this was a victim of executive meddling at an extreme scale in the scriptwriting stage. Several different ideas from different drafts got thrown together without any real concern for what actually worked for the story. There was an effort to appeal more to children and sell toys that overrode everything else. However, you can still make essentially a two-hour long toy commercial that feels of a piece, and this isn’t it. I don’t know how much to lay at the feet of Schumacher, he was essentially a hired hand to fulfil the wishes of metaphorical children with loaded guns, but it still feels like a Schumacher film through and through. I don’t like it.

Rating: 1/4

5 thoughts on “Batman Forever”

  1. Along with the script seeming to try to be deeper than its predecessors but more cartoon at the same time, one of the biggest problems I have with this shlock is that there is nothing in the villains to distinguish themselves.

    They aren’t great antagonists for a Batman film as they don’t show off aspects of Batman’s personality as anything more than surface level, neither are a physical threat so while Batman reacts, it just doesn’t feel either like a John McClaine struggle but more a Superman struggle to write a character who can minimally be seen to make the lead sweat a bit, though the outcome never feel overly in doubt. Even the blowing up of Batman’s stuff and him then relying on prototypes seems to say the costume makes the hero, as if Batman is The Greatest American Hero. Though he does do some figuring out of Riddler’s puzzles, so he does a little more than just punch and kick.

    On top of that there is so little difference between Carey and Jones’ performances to make them feel like anything more than a single character fighting itself for control. Sure that works if you want to explore Bruce Wayne V. Batman and which is the real person, but with Carey and Jones its more Batman vs Batman in that neither really feels all that different outside the garish costumes. But it did make Schumacher suffer as Carrey and Jones hated each other 9maybe still do) and made each other miserable on the set, so their experience echoed mine.

    Its clear the studios wanted to sell more toys (Which has been admitted in the years since the film was made, and it worked from all reports) as well as not make McDonalds uncomfortable being a partner with the film (Ronald did not like Returns darkness at all). I know Batman and Robin is more hated at large because, well, it’s Batman and Robin but I hate Forever more because at least B&R is consistent where as this mess is all over the place from scene to scene.

    Odd note- I still use one of the McDonald’s glasses for collecting odds and ends, so something useful came out of the film for me.


    1. This was the one Batman movie I really remembered from my childhood. I think it’s the only one I saw in theaters until Batman Begins. There was always a certain level of nostalgia in me when I would (very rarely) think about it.

      Revisiting it this time was a bit of a depressing experience. Nothing made sense. Nothing fit together. It felt like everyone involved had thrown five different scripts into a blender and put it on the merchandizing setting.

      Two Face ends up feeling like an also-ran villain in the end. He does surprisingly little that affects much while The Riddler is much more the focus. Batman just up against the waifish Riddler as a villain was enough, the Riddler being smart enough to outsmart Batman on his own, but that would have taken Schumacher thinking seriously about the characters.


  2. I don’t like it either. This movie has the death penalty in twelves systems.

    The decision to move more towards the Adam West Batman is a mistake. It breaks what little grounding in reality we have in Gotham and we need all the help we can get suspending disbelief.

    Two Face didn’t work for me, he almost never does outside the comics and the Animated Series. Tommy Lee Jones puts in a garish performance and that also doesn’t work for me.

    I will say, I kinda liked Jim Carey’s Riddler. Not the script or writing, but his performance as fully-unhinged Joker has the kind of manic energy he brought to The Mask and Ace Ventura. It entertained me. That doesn’t mean his plot makes any sense or was enjoyable.

    Likewise Nicole Kidman…I don’t care about her character or found her believable, but she’s really easy to look at.

    I think the one person trying is Val Kilmer, despite his reputation, when he gives a shit it shows. In fact, for physicality and icy charm, I think he is the best non-animated Batman and Bruce Wayne.


    1. I like Carrey as the Riddler, but I don’t like him as Edward Nigma. He should have started nebbish and reserved, broken by some great event. Instead he’s wild and manic from the beginning, so his break that makes him the Riddler is unclear at best. I imagine Schumacher just let Carrey be Carrey, figuring that you don’t direct a comic talent at the height of his popularity.

      Kidman looks great, but I’ll take Pfeiffer’s Seline/Catwoman any day.

      And Kilmer’s fine, it’s just that he doesn’t have a whole lot to work with.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s