2.5/4, 2020s, Action, Dan Trachtenberg, Horror, Review, Science Fiction

Prey

This is one of those movies that I want to like more than I actually do. It addresses some of my issues with a movie monster, has some great individual sequences, but I don’t think it actually comes together all that well. It’s got a couple of ideas that it introduces and never explores with any real depth while feeling structurally off, especially considering its first act. I can see why some audiences are eating it up, it provides the kind of pseudo-scifi monster action they would expect. However, I don’t quite get invested, and I think the film suffers a bit for that.

My problem with the Predator as a movie monster is that he’s always been unfair. Eight-feet tall with highly advanced technology, I never saw how it would be fun or dangerous for him to show up on Earth, cloaked with plasma weapons, and blow supposedly dangerous prey away without ever making it a fair fight, it only getting fair if the quarry is smart enough to figure it all out. Well, this Predator is still cloaked from the beginning (I think it’s a desire to hide the monster, a somewhat fruitless affair since he’s just a small variation on a monster we’ve seen half-a-dozen times already in the movies), which is unfair, but he only escalates his weapons as his prey become more dangerous. When he lands, he’s discovering the food chain of the planet, killing snakes and then wolves before he gets to larger game, and he does all of that with just his knives. I like that.

The actual story revolves around the young Comanche Naru (Amber Midthunder) who wishes to prove herself a warrior as capable as the men, especially her brother Taabe (Dakota Beavers). My largest structural problem with the film is in this first act where Naru tries to help Taabe and the other hunters track down a lion that’s become a danger to their small village. My problem is that they deal with it (in a visually striking scene where Naru and another warrior hang out in a tree before being attacked). It becomes the excuse for why Taabe becomes declared the warrior chief of the village, a title that seems to have no affect on anything in the film except that Naru knows it was her plan and her spear that led to the beast’s death at Taabe’s hands. It’s a small feminist critique of male power, and it never really plays into the rest of the movie.

This becomes a structural problem when a new natural threat is introduced, a bear. Instead of a natural progression of following one, smaller threat into the larger, main threat of the Predator, the movie has a threat, completely deals with it, and then, about twenty minutes into the film, introduces a new threat (the bear) that carries us to the Predator. It’s really weird. Anyway, Naru decides to go out and prove herself by chasing down this bear, getting into huge trouble because she tries to take down a thousand pound bear with a bow and arrow, and barely escapes except for the help of the Predator, who has found an even bigger prey to hunt. She escapes with the Predator just behind her but gets trapped in a French fur trader’s bear trap, immobilized, and the Predator stops the pursuit. She’s no long a threat. It’s no longer sport. See? The Predator is much improved.

Then we get the fur traders. The big reason they’re in the film is to provide cannon fodder for the Predator in the film’s finale. I really like the use of the French because it allows for the difference in language between the Comanche and the European settlers to remain while keeping up with the idea that the Comanche are actually speaking their own language but we hear English. The use of languages in foreign cultures is a small, but interesting question, and I think Prey found a good way to handle it simply by choosing the French, which still precipitates the need for a translator, Raphael (Bennett Taylor).

I think there’s supposed to be something equating the French with the Predator, especially with the use of a field of a couple of dozen buffalo skinned and left to be pecked at by carrion as an important moment earlier in the film. This is supposed to help us turn against them emotionally and feel no remorse at their later killing, but it’s unclear what this point is actually supposed to be beyond a very thin “killing is bad” equation which doesn’t work very well (it’s the difference between trade and sport in my mind).

Anyway, the point is the action, and the action is really pretty. Set at some kind of magic hour that doesn’t make a whole lot of sense with ashes falling out of the air, it’s the Predator going full-Predator, up to and including the use of his trademarked trilogy of red laser dots. Used as bait, Naru gets spared, enough to witness what’s happening and prepare mentally for the final bout where she uses all she’s learned to take him out. It’s solidly built stuff, and it works.

I appreciated the film a bit by the end, but that weird disconnect between the first act and the unclear (probably more simplistic, to be honest) use of the French put me off a bit. The action is good, Midthunder is a pretty decent lead (though Beavers is all around a more interesting actor and has a better and more badass character in Taabe), and it consistently looks really pretty. It’s better than The Predator, that’s for sure, though. Dan Trachtenberg made a minor thriller masterpiece in his first film, 10 Cloverfield Lane. His sophomore effort shows continued promise, and I still look forward to whatever he has in store next. I hope it’s something original instead of tied to a franchise, though.

Rating: 2.5/4

4 thoughts on “Prey”

  1. The technical aspects of the film look to be spot on. Whoever did their props, choreography (stupid wire work aside…which is still stupid) and did the coaching did a fine job. Some details are very right, including the ass-backwards way they pull their bow. But there are other things that leapt out at me right away, from putting a line on a throwing axe (I’ve done that, it fucks up the balance and prevents the end-over-end throws required for any distance and power) to the fact that Comanches in the 1700’s are PLAINS Indians, horsemen and buffalo hunters. They’re LEGENDARY horsemen. So where are the horses here? Where’s the Chief? Tribes have a structure. Someone apparently saw ‘Last of the Mohicans’ and decided all Indians live like that in upstate New York.

    But it’s the female lead and the feminist message that has me saying ‘Nope. Out.’ Nothing in any of the reviews I’ve seen so far make me want to reward this with my time and money.

    Like

    1. We have HULU pretty steadily (the wife gets it consistently at Black Friday for something like a dollar a month), so I just said, “Whatever. Let’s check it out.”

      There is an opening graphic saying that it’s the plains but there are shocking little plains around. It’s very hilly.

      It’s alright. Aside from the “girlboss is actually responsible for the dead lion” in the beginning it’s pretty standard Ripley-esque female action hero stuff. She’s no Mary Sue or anything (she fails a good bit and has to learn over the film). It mostly feels like Trachtenberg was given a relatively small box in which to operate, and he did his best considering the amount of message stuff he was supposed to put in. I’ve seen worse.

      Like

      1. Jah, it sounds competent. I’m just not rewarding ‘girl boss’ anything. I’ve also stopped reading books with female protagonist after getting burned….way…way too many times. Sad but that’s where I am. I still have an unread book pile you would not believe. (Finally shelved all my Louis L’Amour books in my newest bookcase)

        I still don’t have Hulu, maybe that will change. We’ll see.

        Like

      2. It was different when Ripley was the exception to the rule, now every action movie has to have a female lead proving herself as tough as the guys. It’s monotonous. So, even when the movie doesn’t try to have a message (this one does, but it’s more akin to a subplot), it’s just another in the sea of sameness.

        I get it.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s