1930s, 3/4, Horror, Review, Tod Browning, Universal Monsters

Dracula

The first official cinematic adaptation of Bram Stoker’s seminal novel (the tales of the illegality of F.W. Murnau’s Nosferatu tickle me), Tod Browning’s Dracula is a handsomely produced gothic romance that manages to capture enough of the novel to retain a semblance of a story while removing any kind of emotional investment. At only 74-minutes long (reportedly cut down after its initial run with footage that’s never been recovered), it covers a lot of story very quickly while putting a surprising amount of focus on Renfield, almost making him the main character of the whole thing. It’s an entertaining adaptation, heavy with atmosphere and held up with some fairly good performances, but it misses any kind of real catharsis.

The movie begins with Renfield (Dwight Frye) heading towards Transylvania to meet with Count Dracula (Bela Lugosi) to finish up his purchase of Carfax Abbey in London. Why choose to start the film with Renfield on this trip instead of Jonathan Harker (David Manners)? I imagine the play, written by Hamilton Deane and John L. Balderston, that the film was based on made this choice, but it really undermines the later sense of romantic adventure that usually fills the back-half of the film. Instead of Harker getting free of Dracula’s wives and making his way back to England, he’s just there, in England, sitting around with Mina (Helen Chandler), waiting for things to go wrong. So, that puts the first twenty-minutes’ focus fully on Renfield, and that has the side effect of giving Renfield so much screentime that, in a film stuffed with characters and events, he becomes the closest the movie has to a main character. He even has an arc.

The main focus, though, is Lugosi’s Dracula, and his performance has just become the standard of what one expects from a Dracula. Elegantly dressed with a thick European accent and a stare to rule the minds of men and women, Lugosi brings his stage role to the screen with a restrained style that fits the character well. I wouldn’t go so far as to call him scary, but he is appropriately unnerving at the right moments.

The film, though, questions no motives of Dracula. Why does he want to buy Carfax and move to England? It is simply unconcerned with the question, accepting it part of the tale and moving forward. Also, Renfield immediate state of madness only has an implied explanation, though I do enjoy Frye’s performances, especially the shot where he’s discovered in the hold of the Vesta (renamed from the Demeter for I’m not sure why) where he simply stares up into the light with a crazed smile on his face.

The action in England follows the story beats from the novel pretty closely (minus the rescue of Harker, of course), and Dracula gains his influence of Mina following his turning of Lucy (Frances Dade). Lucy’s story seems to have been a victim of the Hays Board’s recutting of the film after the imposition of the Hays Code. She turns, becomes the Woman in White, preys on children, and then Van Helsing (Edward Van Sloan) promises that her torment will come to an end, and then it’s simply never mentioned again. There must be a scene cut where they kill her.

Van Helsing is another of the film’s performative heights. Sloan gives him a quiet wit as he works through the problem of what’s happening to the patient of Dr. Seward (Herbert Brunston). It starts with an examination of the blood and the search for a logical explanation for Renfield obsession with eating living things. It becomes more when he discovers that Dracula doesn’t cast a reflection in a mirror. The showdown is very Victorian as the two stare at each other and explain that pain will come to the other, all in quite polite terms.

Mina’s turn into a vampire holds no real emotional weight since she’s barely a character, and it’s not helped by the fact that Harker is barely a character himself. The pull and tug of Mina’s heart doesn’t really mean anything because we’re not invested in them beyond their roles in a tale of vampires. Oddly, this is where Renfield becomes more interesting. His jump into madness is frustratingly absent, but his effort to claw out and actually deal with a certain amount of guilt for his implied role in the seduction of Mina is surprisingly clear. His ending has a twinge of tragedy, and he’s the only source of real emotion I found in the film.

Still, that ending is all about the grand confrontation between Dracula, Van Helsing, and Harker. Like most of the film, it’s filmed in grandly staged sets with wonderful senses of both depth and height. It makes the sense of grand gothic horror palpable that really helps the film in strong ways.

Dracula is a fun start to the classic Universal horror monsters. It’s not deep or really scary, but it has a surprise focus on Renfield that works and a wonderful visual sense. Browning had been making movies since the 1910s, and his visual experience is well used to give this cinematic adaptation of the Stoker novel real style.

Rating: 3/4

9 thoughts on “Dracula”

    1. He can’t really suffer in this one because of his removal from the visit to Transylvania. He feels more like one of Lucy’s paramours rather than the central figure on which the whole effort to combat Dracula hangs.

      I think the strength of the refocus onto Renfield might almost be an accident, but a very happy one. Done to streamline certain information in the opening act of the film, it makes Renfield far more interesting, I think, than in most adaptations, who amounts to a crazy person, the prototypical vampire’s familiar and little else.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. Hmmm, regarding the change of ship name; Vesta is the Roman Goddess of hearth and home, and Demeter is the Greek Goddess of fertility, so no telling why the ship’s name was change. Doesn’t seem to be any relevance to vampires or {not very well-hidden lesbianism a la Lucy and Mina}.

    I’m tempted to quip that the whole thing was just a terrible misunderstanding due to Dracula’s Eastern European language barrier: He didn’t want to BUY Carfax . . . he just wanted to GET the Carfax for the Model A Ford that Renfield was supposed to provide for him. That would be a silly quip, and I shan’t do it. No, I simply shannot.

    Great review, TJM. Never been much of a vampire movie guy, though Nosferatu is one that I’ll always watch if I can catch it somewhere.

    Like

    1. That would be a silly quip. I admire your resilience in resisting the urge to share it. Admirable.

      The 10/15 thread will be about Nosferatu at the HQ. MPPPP wrote it. I just need to format it and post it.

      Like

      1. Very like The Prometheus Syndrome, we must resist the urge to quip in a silly fashion. It’s tough, but we manage.

        Looking forward to the Nosferatu review.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I have mixed feeling about Renfield standing in for Harker. On the one hand, it does reduce the influence of Jonathan Harker on the story. On the other hand, I appreciate the backstory on Renfield. This does keep the spirit of the opening of the novel, the arrival. The book starts very much like a travelogue (side note, I do dearly love epistolary fiction, it works so well for horror. It’s pretty out of fashion today but I did sell a short story once that used that format).

    Third hand…the movie is called Dracula, not Harker and I’d rather trim the lack of charisma that is Harker/Manners than Bela.

    And honestly, Bela’s performance in this first Dracula movie really does hold up. He’s charming and sinister. Sadly it’s considered almost parody today, but looking at it with as fresh eyes as I can manage…it’s a really good performance.

    This is one of the better Van Helsings too, another character who’s almost become a parody with all the adaptations and corruptions of his character. In the novel he is a very devout Christian and well as a brilliant scientist. He’s very humanist, in the best sense of the word, full of compassion. Much like Agatha Christie’s Poirot, actualy.

    Anyway, this is a great Halloween flick and if much of the complexity of the story is missing, the tone is intact and that counts for a lot in Horror.

    Like

    1. Poor, poor Bela. His career simply never became more than this. He never became anything like a minor treasure for the studio like Karloff or Chaney, and he ended up essentially begging for work. I don’t know his biography, so I’m not sure where the heroin comes in, whether early or late after the troubles finding work. However, he was always better than Chaney Jr., at least. Universal did him wrong. Maybe.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s